Methodology
How these checklists are built
Immigration information is abundant, contradictory and often out of date. The value here is not more words about a country; it is a structure that makes the requirements comparable, and a review date you can judge.
01
One authority per country
Every destination file begins with the immigration authority’s own published requirements: the ministry, the immigration service, or the official visa portal. Secondary sources are used only to explain what a requirement means in practice, never to establish it.
02
Structure before prose
Each country is written into the same fields — routes, income tests, fees, documents, phases, mistakes, questions. If a fact does not fit a field, it is either a footnote or it does not belong on the page.
03
Review dates, not vibes
Fees, salary floors and processing times change annually, and sometimes mid-year. Every page carries the month it was last reviewed, and figures that cannot be confirmed are described as indicative rather than presented as exact.
04
Affiliate links are declared
Some links to legal, insurance, currency and relocation services are affiliate links. They appear next to the step they relate to, they are labelled as partner offers, and they never replace the guidance. A commission does not change what a checklist says is required.
What this site is not
It is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for the authority’s own checklist. Immigration decisions turn on details a general guide cannot see: your nationality, your income history, a prior refusal. Where a decision is close, a licensed practitioner in the destination country is the right next step — several are listed beside the relevant steps as partner offers.